Adam Tracy Review

1/5 - (4 votes)

This is an archive of a consumer complaint published against Adam Tracy at on 12-Jan-15.


Business Details –

  • Name: Adam Tracy
  • Address: 520 Roosevelt Rd. Suite 200
  • City: Wheaton
  • State: Benin
  • Country: United States
  • Phone: 312.600.512
  • Website:


Original Complaint against Adam Tracy published at on 12-Jan-15 says, verbatim –

Summary of Affidavit listed below: | In September of 2014, Adam Tracy of Securities Compliance Group Ltd. has received fees for service and has egregiously refused to perform or even communicate with his clients. Despite some payment issues from one of the 3 plaintriffs, Tracy agreed to proceed on the case and accept the payment received. | From the period of August 2014 through the end of November, 2014 Tracy flat out refused to effectively communicate in any way with his clients. Phone calls were not accepted, nor returned. Emails were not answered. Skype communications were not responded to. The rare, infrequent incidents of communication that he chose to initiate, were continual promises to start the case, to file the case and each promise included his own self determined time frame which was typically, ‘this week’ or something similar. | When he failed to perform as promised, he subsequently refused to communicate in any way, shape or form. After 3 months of being completely disrespected and, frankly, pissed on, the clients have lost all faith and or confidence in the character of this individual and have no desire to work with him in any manner. | In early December he feigns an interest in moving forward on the case (as always). However, he fails to accept that the clients have no interest in working with a person of this character. | We have demanded a return of fees paid and he refused. | He has effectively STOLEN OUR MONEY UNDER THE FALSE PRETENCES AND THE FALSE PROMISES OF FILING A CASE ON OUR BEHALF! | He now claims that the original agreement was not honored as one of the parties has not paid him which is true. However, this argument ignores the fact that despite this situation, he accepted the payment which was sent and has agreed to proceed and file the case on numerous occasions. This constitutes ‘contract’ with offer, acceptance and consideration. By his continuing to use the original retianer agreement argument, which was superceded by subsequent agreement, it also indicates his incompetence as an attorney by failing to recognize that a valid contract eists. The current contract was created by no other than himself with his agreements subsequent to the original retainer agreement. | Clients have been misled as to his intentions with the case. | Clients have been lied to with respect to his false promises to work on the case. | Clients have been defrauded of their funds sent to Adam Tracy | Clients have no interest in working with a person of this character, regardless of his insistence of being willing to move forward at this very late stage which is well after clients have lost all faith and confidence in this false actor. |

Visit the external source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *